Epistemic Realism in Bradley and Early Moore

نویسندگان

چکیده

In this paper I attempt to show how Moore’s early emancipation from Bradley’s absolute idealism presupposes a fundamental adherence certain theses of itself. particular, argue that the idea an immediate epistemic access concepts and propositions Moore endorses in his platonic atomism (Hylton) is reworking form realism already present Bradley. Epistemic conjunction two theses: i) reality independent any constructive work human mind; ii) immediately (non-discursively) accessible knowledge. first focus on idealist phase (1897), suggesting it should be understood as at isolating thesis Bradley against Kant’s transcendental idealism. then suggest background invariant we understand later rejection monism (1898–9) through anti-psychologism. hence explore conclude with some remarks about further significance Kant.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism

In the last decade, structural realism has been presented as the most promising strategy for developing a defensible realist view of science. Nevertheless, controversy still continues in relation to the exact meaning of the proposed structuralism. The stronger version of structural realism, the so-called ontic structural realism, has been argued for on the basis of some ideas related to quantum...

متن کامل

Moore ’ s Proof and Martin Davies ’ s epistemic projects

In the recent literature on Moore’s Proof of an external world, it has emerged that different diagnoses of the argument’s failure are prima facie defensible. As a result, there is a sense that the appropriateness of the different verdicts on it may depend on variation in the kinds of context in which the argument is taken to be a move, with different characteristic aims. In this spirit Martin D...

متن کامل

Moore-paradoxical belief, conscious belief and the epistemic Ramsey test

Chalmers and Hájek argue that on an epistemic reading of Ramsey’s test for the rational acceptability of conditionals, it is faulty. They claim that applying the test to each of a certain pair of conditionals requires one to think that one is omniscient or infallible, unless one forms irrational Moore-paradoxical beliefs. I show that this claim is false. The epistemic Ramsey test is indeed faul...

متن کامل

Epistemic structural realism and Poincaré’s philosophy of science

Recent discussions of structuralist approaches to scientific theories have stemmed primarily from Worrall’s (1989), in which he defends a position (since characterized

متن کامل

Brand and Bradley 2012b

A Monte-Carlo simulation was conducted to assess the extent that a correlation estimate can be inflated when an average-based measure is used in a commonly employed correlational design. The results from the simulation reveal that the inflation of the correlation estimate can be substantial, up to 76%. Additionally, data was re-analyzed from two previously published studies to determine the ext...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The journal for the history of analytical philosophy

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2159-0303']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v9i6.4294